Love. Rethought.

The most interesting type of love is the purely formal one. A contentless transcendental object=X that is the condition for the possibility of my elusive desire, of my overwhelming, burning, wrenching, parching, swarming thought about an other, not for any fact, any empirical discovery about them, but about them qua themselves. To love them with the formula, X=X, a pure identity that one wishes absolutely to embrace.

What is so terribly special about love, in contrast with friendship, or polite acquaintances? Love is traumatic. It is unnerving. It is violent. Love is Tears. Torment. Shivers. And that itching longing in the bottom left of one’s chest. In it I, as the absolute of my own world (because I am a subject), invites another absolute to center my world around. I, to use a Kiergagaardian metaphor, leap into the other whom I subordinate myself to, making her—sorry for my male chauvinist what-have-you expression…. this is all that I know—absolute, and peeling my centrality away from me.

Because of this, love is supremely ethical. It is my first genuine relation with the world. It is pure openness. It is a will-less release into passion, a confrontation to the always-overflowing finitude. This is why Nietzsche’s entire project hinged on Love. Amor fati. For then can one really become a person, rather than a beast.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s